Jump to content

Talk:2019 Tour Championship/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Reviewer: HawkAussie (talk · contribs) 03:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

  • See no issues here

First Round[edit]

Semi-finals[edit]

Final[edit]

Prize fund[edit]

  • See no issues here

Coral Cup[edit]

  • For all three events qualification was based on players - Missing a comma between events and qualification.

 Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 07:39, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Final Comments[edit]

Reference 10 and 27 both have redirects as they are now in orange. The copyvio is only at 12% so that bit is fine. Other than that this probably needs a bit of work on it before I will be able to give this a GA. HawkAussie (talk) 02:35, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: Just realized that the picture of Judd Trump might cause an issue in the future. I am just putting that up there.

This all seems very easy to fix. Shouldn't take long. I'll get on with it as soon as I can. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 06:28, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've fixed/commented on all of the above HawkAussie thanks for your speedy response. What is the issue with the Trump image? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:24, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Lee Vilenski This is because it has a personally rights warning isn't something that I rarely see. So when I saw that, I thought it could be a possible issue but I might just be over worrying about something. HawkAussie (talk) 23:01, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
HawkAussie, snooker images on commons are quite often like this, as - despite my atrempts- getting companies to release images so far hasn't worked. The image is properly attributed. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 05:54, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Lee Vilenski That does suck in a way, right looking through the rest of them, it's good to go for a GA. HawkAussie (talk) 00:19, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- It's the bane of my life HawkAussie. Thank you for a prompt and hassle free GA review. Have a great day. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 06:43, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.