Talk:2021 Chilean Constitutional Convention election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Programs[edit]

Would be good to include some summary of electoral programs at least for the three main coalition. Does anyone know of a source for that? --Aréat (talk) 17:18, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Use of "Previous Election" field in the table of coalitions[edit]

I would like to dispute the use of the of "Previous Election" field in the table of coalitions. While it is good to provide some context, in this case it's a bit misleading; for one, this election is entirely different from all previous elections, so comparing them seems a bit fallacious. Also, the alliances--being made solely for this election--did not contest the last election (though the parties within them did). Thus, adding the results of the member parties together to yield the alliances "result" is also a bit misleading. At the very least, a major re-phrasing is necessary. Ayvind-Bjarnason (talk) 21:24, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Official results[edit]

Servel published official results regarding this election (see here), but results are quite different from those published last juin (source). Valid votes: 5,713,858 instead of 5,711,254, and number of votes of each list has been changed. This article is based on this "old" source. I'd like updating these datas, but this "new" source shows very different results for parties. For example, regarding UDI it shows 212.086 votes (see) instead of 447,032; regarding PS 189,055 instead of 276,455. In your opinion, which is the reason of this change and which is the best way to update these datas? --151 cp (talk) 02:17, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:37, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]