Talk:2021 College Football Playoff National Championship

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

all star games?[edit]

what "all star games" follow this?! 66.30.47.138 (talk) 00:49, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The 2021 Senior Bowl and 2021 Hula Bowl are currently scheduled for January 30 and 31, 2021, respectively. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 01:09, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
oh, thanks! i had thought those were both OFF this year.... 66.30.47.138 (talk) 02:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
wait a min -- isn't that the weekend where the PRO BOWL usually slips in? are they really on TOP of each other?? 66.30.47.138 (talk) 01:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Yoninah (talk) 14:32, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not a 5x expansion; withdrawn by nominator

(
)
Nick Saban in 2009
Nick Saban in 2009

5x expanded by PCN02WPS (talk), Dmoore5556 (talk), and Muboshgu (talk). Nominated by PCN02WPS (talk) at 17:45, 13 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article missed some critical dates while pursuing ITN, and now it is too long ago that expansion happened. Otherwise, the image is copyright free, the hook is good, the article is suitably referenced and neutral, and QPQ is completed. Here's my calculation of expansion dates, which must see a 5× increase over seven days. If we start at January 1, then the article was at 1343 characters (222 words), with expansion seven days later on Jan 8 at 3196 characters (542 words) – not quite 3×. If we start at January 6, the article was at 2844 characters (485 words), and its expansion at Jan 13 was at 8781 characters (1480 words). These were the two likeliest periods of DYK expansion, showing the greatest expansion in the shortest period of time, but they don't achieve the required 5× level in seven days. The listed day of January 11 shows even less expansion in seven days: 2844 characters (485 words) being increased to 3204 characters (543 words), which is not even 2× expansion. I'm sorry, but this nomination, worthy though the topic may be, doesn't qualify. Binksternet (talk) 05:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • In that case, I will withdraw the nomination. Thanks for your time. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 08:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Translation[edit]

Come on guys we need to translate this. NOW Thegirlwithredhair (talk) 03:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Thegirlwithredhair: Can you be more specific? What needs translated to English? —C.Fred (talk) 03:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing Needs Translating Into English It's Just We Need More Languages For This Article. Thegirlwithredhair (talk) 19:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

Passed. -- Zoo (talk) 20:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2021 College Football Playoff National Championship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ZooBlazer (talk · contribs) 05:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'll be happy to handle this review. I'll hopefully get through the article tomorrow and post my initial thoughts then.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Overall, I think the article is in pretty good shape. There are some minor things I came across when going through the article and I did my best to organize by the sections they're in. -- Zoo (talk) 17:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox[edit]

  • Can you find a source for the anthem being pre-recorded so that you can replace the hidden note in the infobox?
  • Add halftime show info to replace hidden note if possible

Lede[edit]

  • Wikilink EST
  • Change dominating to defeating. It's more neutral, even if it wasn't a close game.

Host selection[edit]

  • CFP organizers announced that they would move the release of final rankings --> add "the" before final
  • You may want to update ref #8 to this as the current ref link is for 2023

Imapct of Covid[edit]

  • I suggest maybe updating the total attendance ref to this. It both confirms the attendance listed in the article, as well as stating that the attendance was 23% of capacity which can be updated in the same section of the article which currently states the percent was approximately 20%.

1st half[edit]

  • Add a space between the game summary and 1st half subsections.
  • Alabama started their next drive well, with a 12-yard pass --> Alabama started their next drive with a 12-yard pass
  • Alabama scored even more quickly on this drive --> Alabama scored even quicker on this drive
  • Ohio State ended their final drive of the first half --> can just say final drive of the half, since the section is about the first half

References[edit]

  • I'd recommend archiving the refs. One ref is already marked as dead (#7) and needs replaced, or if there is an archive available from before the link went down, just add that.
  • Not absolutely necessary, but I suggest Wikilinking the sites for the refs where available. Ex: Sports Illustrated

External links[edit]

  • The official website link is no longer related to the game

Comments[edit]

@PCN02WPS: Are you going to be able to make the edits? I'd hate to have to fail this when it's so close to passing. -- Zoo (talk) 18:46, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ZooBlazer I believe everything is taken care of, ready for another look. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PCN02WPS Everything looks good except ref #9 (formerly 7) is still dead and didn't get an archive. Fix that and I'll pass the article. -- Zoo (talk) 21:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@ZooBlazer Totally missed that one - it's been taken care of now. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 19:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PCN02WPS Everything looks good now. Passing. Congrats! -- Zoo (talk) 20:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:54, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2021_College_Football_Playoff_National_Championship&oldid=1196879827"