Jump to content

Talk:2022 Bogoso explosion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk21:05, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Explosion aftermath
Explosion aftermath
  • ... that on 20 January 2022, a mining explosives truck detonated in Apiate, Ghana, damaging around 500 buildings and killing 13 people (aftermath pictured)? Source: "The blast damaged around 500 surrounding houses" from: Bancroft, Holly (21 January 2022). "At least 17 dead after huge road explosion in western Ghana". The Independent. Retrieved 25 January 2022. and "At least 13 people were killed in a blast in western Ghana on Thursday after a motorcycle collided with a vehicle carrying explosives" from: CNN, Nimi Princewill, AnneClaire Stapleton, Stephanie Busari and Martin Goillandeau. "Almost entire town leveled after explosives delivery truck crash in Ghana". CNN. Retrieved 2022-01-21. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

Created by Enock4seth (talk) and Dumelow (talk). Nominated by Dumelow (talk) at 08:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks Urve, I know they have copied from us because I remember writing the paragraph about the casualties and damage myself! To confirm, it was in the article by 28 January while the publication date of that GLitzEmpire article is 2 February. Cheers - Dumelow (talk) 21:42, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Beautiful, thanks; the 2 February date gave me pause, but I wasn't sure if their software saw edits as a new publication. OK, QPQ is good, copyvio is resolved (disappointing that they copied from us), the citations for the hook and throughout the article are good and to reliable sources, neutral tone. I can't find a source that the image is appropriately licensed, though, and the uploader to commons does not appear to be the author of the image; unless that's resolved, I recommend that this be promoted without the image. Urve (talk) 22:16, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]