Talk:2022 City of Edinburgh Council election/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Refined Review (27/Jun/24):

Review

This article has passed every one of the 6 GA requirements and other requisites so it's good there, same with reader experience I did read it for this review and it was fairly well put together, and I had almost all the info I needed. It does need pictures but it's alright. I do have to note that I didn't find any copyright violations since they did a good job of avoiding Wikipedia a lawsuit and for original research I googled the results and compared my findings to the article, I believe they are 0 original research since it was, in fact, accurate to the tee, in fact they used the same Reference ^[1] that I used to check the article, fair play on using the official government results.

Result

My verdict stands as it did previously, It is a pass and it deserves it by a long shot the only thing it doesn't have is illustration which, to be fair, can't over come.

Pass Arotparaarms (talk) 01:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before the review[edit]

Before I review this I very quickly just want to ask @Stevie fae Scotland why this article hasn't been rated "B" class yet and why you would want to bump it right up to GA status. I won't be considering this for the review but it is weird.

Review[edit]

To start, this article is well written and is neutral which is very important when it comes to politics, one thing it should have is pictures of the candidates though I couldn't find any free pictures of any of them so I won't complain.

The article is a good and well in the standard of a good election article though it isn't that big, though considering it is a city election, size isn't the key factor.

Moving on to the information, it has all a reader might need. I won't go into detail on the flaws but the only things that did bother me were the lack of pictures (which to be fair I couldn't find either) and the fact that it isn't the biggest of the lot.

Conclusion[edit]

I am a little confused at this point on what I stated previously, why jump straight to GA? I will wait for your reply but my verdict is that on a scale of 1-10, it is a solid 8/10 on the deserving scale, and it meets all of the requirements of a GA (But it does miss point 6, illustration though I will let it slide) I will edit this review and grant GA to the article after your reply. EDIT: I am passing it as I see no reason not to, though I am a little confused nonetheless

Hey, thanks so much for the review. I don't tend to update the ratings on pages I've edited as I'm not always sure I've definitely covered everything. I prefer submitting here when I think it's ready for a GA review so that I can get the feedback. I've done this with all the other 2022 election GAs I've worked on. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 18:53, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh alright, seems about right sorry to bother ya

Cheers, Arotparaarms (talk) 20:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^ https://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/election-results/local-government-elections-2022-results

[1] ttps://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/election-results/local-government-elections-2022-results

[1]