Talk:2023 Rugby World Cup statistics
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2023 Rugby World Cup statistics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Player Points Table has misplaced headings on mobile app[edit]
The Player Points table appears fine using Microsoft Edge on my Laptap computer, and also using Google Chrome on my Desktop computer, but, using the Wikipedia app on my mobile, the headings appear misplaced, so that Tries, Conversions, and Penalties have just a grey space for their heading, while Drop Goals has Tries as its (obviously very misleading) heading. I don't know how to fix this, and I don't have time to try to learn, so, per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, I'm mentioning it here in the hope that somebody else might know how to fix it (or be willing and able to try to find out). Tlhslobus (talk) 22:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Discussion on Records and statistics of the Rugby World Cup to Remove Some Statistical Tables[edit]
There is currently a discussion on the Records and statistics of the Rugby World Cup talk related to the removal of some statistical tables. The discusssion can be accessed here. Your input is most welcome and, of course, the consensus of the community will be abided by. 79.154.65.115 (talk) 14:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Excessive statistics[edit]
Why do we need a full list of every point scorer in the competition? As an encyclopaedia, we should be using editorial judgement and condensing vast swathes of statistics down into items that readers can easily absorb, not adding full statistical analyses indiscriminately. A lot of this is completely unsourced too. I'll do a proper review this evening. – PeeJay 15:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC)