Talk:20 mm Polsten

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

"Unit cost £60 - £70"? Highly unlikely[edit]

There is simply no way that the per unit cost was "£60 - £70" when the per unit cost of Lee Enfield rifles was over £8 per rifle at the time. While the Polsten was "simplified" it still required considerable machining and high quality steel alloys. Production of 20mm barrels alone would have cost more than £70. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.209.147 (talk) 22:12, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]