Talk:20s

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was No move Duja► 12:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

20s to decade from 20 to 29 through the 90s to decade from 90 to 99. 20s etc. strongly suggests the 1920s. Most people searching for the 90s etc. are looking for an article on the 1990s. Hence 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s should be disambiguation pages. Voortle 22:12, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Voortle 22:17, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. To keep consistency for all decade articles. I agree with your point that people would likely refer to 1920s when typing "20s", but there is already a dab link to 1920s at the top of 20s. --supernorton 05:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per supernorton. JPG-GR 21:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above, and people looking for the real 20s are highly unlikely to type "decade from 20 to 29"--Victor falk 13:40, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Per Supernorton Reginmund 15:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, and note that no reason was given at WP:RM, and that only this article was nominated, not 30s, etc.. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 17:27, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.