Talk:23 Paces to Baker Street

23 Paces to Baker Street is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Review skews the piece…[edit]

The bulk of the article is given over to one, very negative review - was the reception really so bad? It is a movie which I have heard compared favourably to the works of Hitchcock, and it still plays frequently on TV (certainly in the U.K.), where I have watched it and found it reasonably engaging. The Film4 website rate it as three out of five stars, and the viewer voting gives it four out of five stars (admittedly only on 19 responses). It may not be the world’s greatest picture, but I think that such a lengthy extract of a single person’s response (which is effectively original research on that single critic’s part) to the film slants the whole article. If it really was so badly received, I think there needs to be further corroboration, or examples of other opinion (they could be equally bad, I’m not suggesting a white-wash, but something that shows this was a prevailing opinion). Jock123 (talk) 11:12, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Crowther hates a whole lot of films ... will look for other review .... Luigibob (talk) 02:59, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That was then, this is now - has not anyone found a more positive review? Perhaps not the greatest of films, was it really that bad? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.29.103.52 (talk) 16:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]