Talk:370 Jay Street/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vami IV (talk · contribs) 19:08, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Opening statement

Hello, and come what may from this review, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. During the review, I may make copyedits, which I will limit to spelling correction and minor changes to punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. The Nominator(s) should understand that I am a grammar pedant, and I will nitpick in the interest of prose quality. For responding to my comments, please use  Done,  Fixed,  Added,  Not done,  Doing..., or  Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 19:08, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

@Epicgenius: Now for wrath

Pre-prose review

• There are too many citations for a lot of the article. Four citations for a sentence is pushing it, but six tosses "it" into outer space.
  •  Done--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 23:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Prose

@Kew Gardens 613: Can you address these three when you have a moment? This article is very close to passing. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 05:29, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

• in post-World War II modernist style. the post-World War II modernist style.
  •  Done--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 10:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
• The design had originally been drafted prior to World War II;[7][10][11] it was originally envisioned as an Art Deco-style building. Two uses of "originally" in the same sentence.
  •  Done--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 10:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
• anticipation of unification of the transit system, the unification.
  •  Done--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 10:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

GA progress

Article passes CopyVio scanner. Images are all relevant and tagged/free. References are credible. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 00:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.