Talk:3rd Division (Vietnam)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 3rd Division (Vietnam) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Asian / Southeast Asia / Cold War / Post-Cold War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
	Post-Cold War task force

Vietnam Low‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Non-Neutral Sources and Phrasing[edit]

Similar to the 2nd Division (Vietnam) article, sources used for this page should not be regarded as neutral, as its reliant on sources which is disclaimed as Official US Military History. The sources used are again from MACV Operation Reports which are notoriously unreliable or accurate in description of events, facts and figures, per Vietnam War body count controversy. There is no attempt to prove factually the matters or events rather than just reporting it. Either the article should disclaim outrightly when this is used or cite better third-party sources. 45.62.243.176 (talk) 06:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe that then you need to provide WP:RS that offers alternative views rather than just tagging and criticizing the multiple WP:RS that are provided. Mztourist (talk) 06:13, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care about alternative views. But its clear that using a source that literally calls itself Official History, and writes for the opposing side in a conflict is not a clear or objective source. Don't remove the tag unless you find third party accounts or some other indicator, or just indicate it in the article which sources says which. 45.62.243.176 (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes its obvious you don't care about alternative views and can't provide any constructive input based on WP:RS. Your whole MO is simply criticize sources that contradict your POV. In any event: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/A bicyclette#06 November 2018 Mztourist (talk) 06:29, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What are you even rambling about? 45.62.243.176 (talk) 07:21, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It must be so frustrating for you being indefinitely blocked...Mztourist (talk) 08:07, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not blocked? I don't get why you are taking things so personally, its not obviously good for your mental or physical health.45.62.243.176 (talk) 08:17, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can respond to the SPI. Mztourist (talk) 08:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And of course 45.62.243.176 was blocked as a sock/proxy. Mztourist (talk) 08:37, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]