Talk:8th Military Police Brigade (United States)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Well done.
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- In the lead, it would be best if "Korea" is linked once, per here. The article tends to have "red links", if they don't have articles, it would be best to un-link them, per here. In the Reactivation in Korea section, why are "1984", "1995", and "2006" linked?
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:59, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- In the lead, it would be best if "Korea" is linked once, per here. The article tends to have "red links", if they don't have articles, it would be best to un-link them, per here. In the Reactivation in Korea section, why are "1984", "1995", and "2006" linked?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- It would be best if the references use the {{cite web}} format.
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:59, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- It would be best if the references use the {{cite web}} format.
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- If the above statement can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:34, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- All MoS issues fixed. The problems were just my misunderstanding of the style guide. -Ed!(talk)(Hall of Fame) 22:47, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- Refcites done. How does it look now? -Ed!(talk)(Hall of Fame) 17:26, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you to Ed for getting the stuff I left at the talkpage, cause I have gone off and passed the article to GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:59, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- Refcites done. How does it look now? -Ed!(talk)(Hall of Fame) 17:26, 21 August 2008 (UTC)