Talk:94 Meetings/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 21:33, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I have compiled the following comments:
- Plot
- "Leslie chains herself to the front gate to prevent construction crews from entering." - but the pic shows Tom tying her to the gate
- Fixed. — Hunter Kahn 21:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- "Andy now acts uninterested in April because he feels uncomfortable about the age difference between them" - what is the age difference?
- Fixed. — Hunter Kahn 21:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- "Ron gives her an approving smile and nod, while carving a wooden duck in his office." - I don't get this. Did I miss something above?
- Fixed. — Hunter Kahn 21:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Production
- "The family includes April's extremely chipper mother and father Larry and Rita Ludgate (John Ellison and Terri Hoyos), and April's older sister Natalie Ludgate (Minni Jo Mazzola), who is cynical and brooding very much like April herself." Why is this important enough to be in this section.
- I thought it was worthwhile just because it's the family of one of the major characters in the show. But if you think it's not needed, by all means, drop it. — Hunter Kahn 21:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Reception
- "94 Meetings" received particularly high ratings among males between ages 18 and 34" - is there a reason for this?
- None that the source gives. — Hunter Kahn 21:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- General
- I think there is something wrong with the page formatting, as the quotebox is below the References.
- I'm not seeing that error on my end. Can you be more specific? (Incidentally, I realized I forgot to add an "External links" section. That is now added.) — Hunter Kahn 21:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Regards, Xtzou (Talk) 21:33, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 21:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Reply The pull quote is below the External links. (I use Firefox 3.6.3 on a wide screen.) There is a very large photo of a woman just above it that dwarfs the pic in the infobox. Xtzou (Talk) 22:39, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps the picture was too big and was pushing it down. I tried to reduce the size, let me know if that helped. — Hunter Kahn 23:24, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Somewhat. I think it is better that the pic is reduced, but the pic bleeds down into the References. Now the pull quote is opposite the External links. Do you have to have that list of guest stars? That is what's taking all the space. You could try sandwiching, putting some things on the left. In you browser it's not a problem? Xtzou (Talk) 23:40, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- No, and I have a pretty large browser myself. But I've cut some of the lesser important guests from the list to try to help. — Hunter Kahn 23:54, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well, that's better. It at least gets the pull quote opposite the references. What browser do you use? Xtzou (Talk) 00:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Firefox all the way, baby. :D I move the picture of Alison to the left. Hopefully that will help. — Hunter Kahn 00:27, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Much better! Xtzou (Talk) 10:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Firefox all the way, baby. :D I move the picture of Alison to the left. Hopefully that will help. — Hunter Kahn 00:27, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well, that's better. It at least gets the pull quote opposite the references. What browser do you use? Xtzou (Talk) 00:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- No, and I have a pretty large browser myself. But I've cut some of the lesser important guests from the list to try to help. — Hunter Kahn 23:54, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Somewhat. I think it is better that the pic is reduced, but the pic bleeds down into the References. Now the pull quote is opposite the External links. Do you have to have that list of guest stars? That is what's taking all the space. You could try sandwiching, putting some things on the left. In you browser it's not a problem? Xtzou (Talk) 23:40, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps the picture was too big and was pushing it down. I tried to reduce the size, let me know if that helped. — Hunter Kahn 23:24, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
Yes
- B. MoS compliance:
Complies with the basic MoS
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
Sources are reliable
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Well referenced
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
Another good article. Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 10:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC)