Talk:9th Street Art Exhibition

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article name[edit]

This article has moved around to many different names, and the current one doesn't seem appropriate, as it has " marks in it. I propose that since the street is properly "9th Street", that the article be renamed "9th Street Art Exhibition". Akradecki 18:01, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Akradecki: I thank you for your comment about the 'renaming to "9th Street Art Exhibition". Please help me to change it as you find better suited. I had at this point so many names for this that it is seriouly a problem. Thank you very much. Sincerely Yours, Protector 14:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Akradecki: If this takes too much time I am happy to contribute more to wikipedia.org. Thank you. 15:58, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Done. Akradecki 16:28, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Akradecki:

Thank you so much. I will contribute again to wikiedia. Please let me know what happened to those references that now are being listed by the {}. Would you want me to redo them? I'll be happy to. I think that you and I we made an important service to the public and to wikipedia. Sincerely Yours, Marika

Nah, I doubt they'll delete this one. So far the consensus is keep. This was a bad-faith nomination by someone who is brand new to Wikipedia and has no clue about how we do things or what the criteria for deletion is. Don't worry, it'll be around. Akradecki 14:22, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No need to redo them...fixed now. Akradecki 17:33, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Akradecki: I hope that now the tag will come off. Sincerely Yours Protector 19:10, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removed it. What this article needs is a one or two sentence introduction (without a header), that starts off with something like "The 9th Street Art Exhibition was a...."

Dear Akradecki: May I use your sentence as an introduction. "The 9th Street Art Exhibition" was a historical, ground-breaking exhibition for its time during a critical period of art history, that was a gathering of a number of notable artists." Would you add it? Sincerely Yours, Protector 00:52, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Akradecki 04:34, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Akradecki: Thank you very much. I am very impressed with your grasp of information. They may delete the whole page but at least we did the best what we could. Sincerely Yours, Protector 12:42, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 12:39, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

january 9 edit[edit]

This edit adds excessive (though charming) detail - should maybe be trimmed?!Super48paul (talk) 16:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Early Canon[edit]

Unclear what someone is trying to communicate by adding this section to the article? I copied the data over here, feel free to added it back once someone has citations and some sentences describing what the importance of early canon painters, related to this art exhibition? Jooojay (talk) 06:42, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Early canon[edit]

Action painters[edit]
  • Willem de Kooning
  • Jackson Pollock
  • Hans Hofmann
Color field painters[edit]
  • Clyfford Still
  • Mark Rothko
  • Barnett Newman
  • Adolph Gottlieb
  • Robert Motherwell

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 9th Street Art Exhibition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:01, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:20, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:53, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:09, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]