Talk:A500 road/GA1
GA Status
[edit]1. It is well written. In this respect:
(a) the prose is clear and the grammar is correct; and- (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.[1]
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect, it:
- (a) provides references to sources used;
- (b)cites reliable sources for quotations and for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, preferably using inline citations for longer articles;[2][3] and
- (c) contains no original research.
3. It is broad in its coverage. In this respect, it:
- (a) addresses the major aspects of the topic; and
- (b) stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary details (see summary style).
4. It is neutral; that is, it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
5. It is stable; that is, it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of an ongoing edit war. Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, and improvements based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply.[4]
6. Any images it contains are appropriate to the subject, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Non-free images must meet the criteria for fair use images and be labeled accordingly.
- Reviewer: TTalk to me 00:55, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
References
- ^ Although the entire Manual of Style should be followed, it is not completely necessary at this level.
- ^ Unambiguous citation is best done through footnotes or Harvard references at the end of a sentence (see the inline citations essay). It is highly recommended that the article have a consistent style of footnoting. Articles one page or shorter can be unambiguously referenced without inline citations. General statements, mathematical equations, logical deductives, common knowledge, or other material that does not contain disputable statements need not be referenced. Articles whose topics fall under the guideline on scientific citations should adhere to the guideline.
- ^ It is generally acceptable for good articles to contain a small percentage of sources with borderline reliability; however, most sources should be reliable.
- ^ Nominations for articles that are unstable because of constructive editing should be placed on hold.