Talk:AI Dungeon

MUD

Sound just like the 1980s user generated text adventures MUD - Multi User Dungeon MUD with AI Generated content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:d591:5f10:7109:7dae:4bde:d436 (talk) 00:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Incorrect source for model text?

AI Dungeon 2 uses the GPT-2 model, which as far as I am aware, is pre-trained on a very large amount of text (see https://openai.com/blog/better-language-models/). The PC Gamer article does claim that it's specifically trained on text from chooseyourownstory.com, but I can't find anything else that supports that as being true.

Goshawksonlyfly (talk) 02:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

I've added a few citations that explicitly mention chooseyourownstory.com, but it seems likely that it's been expanded with other content since then. Certainly if we find any other articles mentioning other sources, let's add them. IAmTheNeil (talk) 18:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Based on Nick (Founder and current dev of AID), all models are currently based on GPT-3. Eleiber (talk) 21:07, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Security vulnerability

I have added a section presenting the security vulnerability found by a third party researcher. I believe it is a reliable primary source as it contains details and proof of the exploit.

I put it under a "criticism" section, but this does not feel like quite the right place for it, so I am open to moving it elsewhere. Frogging101 (talk) 20:32, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Why is it important? Software has vulnerabilities all the time. Secondary coverage allows us to weed out what's critical to include and what's not. We don't have that here. WP:UNDUE is the relevant policy. The researcher claims there's media coverage of the release but none is presented here. It's not Wikipedia's place to track change logs, versions, security patches, vulnerabilities, etc, unless there is reliable coverage of such. -- ferret (talk) 20:45, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Fair enough. --Frogging101 (talk) 20:51, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

VICE news covered this incident https://www.vice.com/en/article/93ywpp/text-adventure-game-community-in-chaos-over-moderators-reading-their-erotica does that count? I already edited the article before I looked here, so let me know if there's an issue 134.49.238.188 (talk) 03:05, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

That's a completely different topic from the one Frogging101 was working on. But yes, Vice is considered a secondary reliable source. -- ferret (talk) 12:22, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

I've since realized that Vice did in fact cover the vulnerability, my apologies for not tying the two together. A sentence worth of mention is probably warranted as a result. I'd recommend the specific fact being that a vulnerability revealed at least a third of stories are explicit. It'd be nice to get another source or two for this topic. -- ferret (talk) 13:59, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Inappropriate training data

From the looks of it AI Dungeon's training data includes many instances of the same graphic and immoral content they are trying to get rid of with recent updates. Going to leave this here just incase anyone can find a way to incorporate this info into the article if there's ever a secondary source.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AIDungeon_2/comments/nlfkxs/latitude_included_sa_of_minors_in_the_ai_dungeon/

https://gitgud.io/AuroraPurgatio/aurorapurgatio

https://github.com/Latitude-Archives/AIDungeon/blob/ca098ca7dab480d24e47954c8873b03ba1091ffc/data/text_adventures.txt

https://github.com/AuroraPurgatio/AIDungeon/blob/ca098ca7dab480d24e47954c8873b03ba1091ffc/data/text_adventures.txt

2603:7000:1F00:6B91:45C2:2024:8DD6:3DCB (talk) 20:32, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 July 2021

Replace the text in GPT-3 edition reviews portion with the following:

The AI's tendency to create graphic and sexual content despite not being prompted by players was noted by reviewers, including Lindsay Bicknell, to which Latitude CEO Nick Walton and employee Suchin Gururangan stated was unexpected, both reasoning that such a thing occurs due to a lack of strict constraints placed on the GPT-3 model, and that they did not do enough to prevent it from behaving this way "In the wild".

Existing reference has been preserved, don't worry about that. Copy-paste from source because all 3 references won't show up on normal text for some reason.

2603:7000:1F00:6B91:EC8D:14E5:D05D:A443 (talk) 02:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

 Done Alduin2000 (talk) 22:56, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

References