Jump to content

Talk:AJS

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Special Category for British Motorcycles

[edit]

As part of the Motorcycling WikProject I am working though all the missing articles and stubs for British Bikes. To make things easier to sort out there is a special Category:British motorcycles Please add to any British motorcycle pages you find or create. It will also help to keep things organised if you use the Template:Infobox Motorcycle or add it where it is missing. I've linked the Category to the Commons Motorcycles of Britain so you could help with matching pics to articles or adding the missing images to the Commons. Thanks Tony (talk) 11:45, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Review

[edit]

The section on AJS Motorcycles Ltd was checked for accuracy and updated by the MD Nick Brown on the 29th August 2008 Tony (talk) 11:45, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manufacturer?

[edit]

Can AJS be classed, as it currently is in Wikipedia, as a "current" motorcycle manufacturer? By the description it "distributed a range of 124cc to 300cc Chinese produced road bikes" - does it actually make bikes, or merely import them? Are the old '74 250cc "Stormers" continuations still being built? This would justify it being defined as a manufacturer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.61.104.8 (talk) 23:25, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update: According to this article from the manufacturer's own website; they only import motorcycles from China: http://www.ajsmotorcycles.co.uk/new_AJS/docs/JSM125/MCN-JSM.pdf Company removed from manufacturers list as it no longer makes the bikes. 193.61.104.8 (talk) 01:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced sections tagged

[edit]

I have placed unreferenced tags September 2013 on one major section and a smaller section. Without wading through the history where there are many minor edits, some of the contributions are attributable to the management of the present-day retail business using the name AJS.

The same thing has happened with the Cotton page where a 'Replicas' section has been introduced for AJS-produced (classic) Cottons. I have removed advertising and performed a clean up on this Replicas section together with an unreferenced tag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.253.80.3 (talk) 18:56, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on AJS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:30, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on AJS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:51, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AJS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]