Talk:AMiBA

AMiBA has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 23, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 27, 2008.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that AMiBA (pictured) is a radio telescope located on Mauna Loa in Hawaii that is being used to observe the Cosmic Microwave Background and the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect in clusters of galaxies?

Astronomy Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hawaii Low‑importance

	Hawaii portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:AMiBA/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 15:56, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
The lead is supposed to be a summary of the entire article, with no original information, and so no sources. In this article, I would recommend moving all of the information on the contributors to a new section, perhaps named "Contributors", with a brief summary sentence in the lead, something along the lines of "with participation from several other leading universities and institutes." I would then add a couple more sentences to the lead that summarize the design and construction history of the telescope.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

A very nice article. I just have a couple of comments regarding the lead and layout of the article, so I am putting it on hold to allow you time to address this. Drop me a note if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 16:20, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good, so I am passing this article to GA status. Thanks for the quick response, and nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 19:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]