Talk:ANN7

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Africa Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

requested review

Hey Stuart, I don't have time for a deeper review, but I wanted to post a few quick thoughts per your request. Thanks for your work getting this one up to speed. I think the article does still have some way to go toward neutrality. The controversy section is awfully long and without much response from a pro-ANN7 POV--has there really been no positive statements about the station, even from the station's own PR?

There's also some WP:SYNTH material in the section on Manyi; it's not clear to me why past incidents unrelated to ANN7 are being added to this article. A good rule of thumb is that if a source doesn't mention the subject of the article, it probably shouldn't be a source in it, especially if it's used for negative material. The word "controversial" generally seems overused throughout (it could be applied to anyone in public life).

To put it in perspective, right now the article gives equal words to a complaint about a billboard as about the station's programming and format. It's generally not a good idea to have a "controversy and criticism" section in an article at all, since it becomes a dumping ground for complaints without a balanced evaluation (see WP:CSECTION), but I think it's particularly problematic that this article is almost entirely a criticism section.

My suggestion would be to rewrite the "controversy" section as more of a station history; that would allow you to put positive statements about the station (even if just from their own releases) alongside the complaints, and contextualize these criticisms. Hope this helps! Thanks again for all your work, -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:30, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ANN7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160407125959/http://www.anc.org.za/show.php?id=11965 to http://www.anc.org.za/show.php?id=11965

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:59, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sale to Mzwanele Manyi

I have reverted recent edits about the sale of ANN7 to Mzwanele Manyi - the addition was poorly written and unsourced. It's also not clear whether the transaction has actually been concluded yet. A good source or two might help clear up the uncertainty (better grammar and typography would also be appreciated). Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:52, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]