Talk:ARA Catamarca/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 16:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Is there another Catamarca that would require the dab, or is it not necessary in the title?
- MOS:BOLDLINK issue in the first sentence of the lead
- The reason why she was built in Germany isn't in the body
- Pennant number needs cited
Good work, placing on hold. Hog Farm Talk 19:46, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- All done. I just left the dab in place, but I don't think that it's actually necessary. I'll move the article once you're done with it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:06, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- That was quick. Move done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:55, 4 July 2022 (UTC)