Talk:ARM Guadaloupe

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ARM Guadaloupe article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Maritime / North America

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Overall, nice work on this article! Is it Guadaloupe or Guadalupe?.

Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:40, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is ARM Guadalupe considered Ironclad warship[edit]

That ship fulfilled criteria of ironclad given by naval historian J. Richard Hill: simultanously having 1) a metal-skinned hull, 2) steam propulsion (paddle-wheel or screw propulsion) and 3) a main armament of guns capable of firing explosive shells (aka Paixhans gun). Kindlydude (talk) 08:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]