Talk:A Canterlot Wedding/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freywa (talk · contribs) 05:31, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Well... I'm a brony and have followed the Canterlot wedding from the time it was announced. But, we need this to conform to Wikipedia standards, not Equestria Daily standards. Let's make this 20% cooler. Brohoof! FreywaParcly Taxel
20% Cooler 05:31, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Fantastic. All the articles I have reviewed before had required at least some edits to the prose.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Also fantastic. I've only got two gripes, which are listed below.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• Don't put songs where they're sung (either excise them or put them in a seperate section).

Done.--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:39, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

• Link "alicorn" (=winged unicorn) in the Plot section.

Done! Ciaran Sinclair (talk) 15:02, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

• Not an issue, but I would prefer to include the producers and directors in the lead.

Done. I also added a bit about ratings.--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:39, 11 May 2012 (UTC)