Talk:A Matter of Perspective

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	A production section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section discusses the "behind the scenes" aspects of the production process, award nominations, and insights into the casting and staffing where possible.
	A response section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section should be well cited using neutral and reliable sources that discuss the reaction of both critics and the viewing audience to the show. Additionally, document any impact the show has had on society, and merchandise that may have resulted from the show, such as toys, games, etc.

Star Trek Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Krieger waves[edit]

According to this website it's Krieger waves.

trial on starship[edit]

This is incorrect:

Picard is unwilling to submit to this demand, and instead requests the trial be held on the Enterprise holodeck, where the crime can be easily re-enacted.

I have just viewed the episode and it is clear that it is not the trial that he wants to be held on the enterprise. He asks Chief Inspector Krag to let him review the evidence held against Riker before agreeing to an extradition. There is even this dialog between Picard an Diana at about the inquiry: "The evidence warants a trial. I will have to allow extradition" This makes it clear that the inquiry on the Enterprise is not the trial but an extradition hearing.

I have changed that passage to better reflect this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.176.74 (talk) 19:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bloopers[edit]

Do we really need the 'Bloopers' section? Lots42 (talk) 08:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On a website who's job it is to be a symposium of information? ...Uh yes... People come to this site to get information, any and all, about the subjects they are looking up. So removing information from a page, surely, goes against the very purpose of Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:B902:9301:C8B0:E0E:E2A9:6FFE (talk) 17:03, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LOL so it's been removed. Sure. I just watched this and noticed that the incriminating holodeck reconstruction shows Riker whipping out his phaser and firing just as he's being transported, but when he beams aboard the Enterprise, there is no phaser in his hand. Therefore it didn't happen that way, and the transporter chief could have testified to that. I don't know if that's a "blooper" or simply a failure of the entire plot. Very poorly done. Wastrel Way (talk) Eric Wastrel Way (talk) 17:22, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]