This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metropolitan Museum of Art. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Metropolitan Museum of ArtWikipedia:GLAM/Metropolitan Museum of ArtTemplate:WikiProject Metropolitan Museum of ArtMetropolitan Museum of Art articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
This website no longer supports this conclusion, as note is blank on the Metropolitan Museum of Art website which says: "This information may change as the result of ongoing research." Question: is this still considered painted by Vermeer? owned by the Metropolitan Museum of Art? Retrieved 24 February 2010.
I believe there's still debate about this painting. I'll try and look into the current state of scholarly opiniobn sometime soon.Jimi 66 (talk) 12:55, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to have gone from the Met's website because it's no longer on display there. The Essential Vermeer website lists it as being in a 'private collection'. Scholarly opinion seems still to be broadly in favour of Vermeer as the painter.Jimi 66 (talk) 13:37, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Have just given this a major expansion,incorporating material from the previous stub whenever possible.Jimi 66 (talk) 13:05, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
