Talk:Aaron Brooks (American football)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Plagiarism[edit]

Portions of this article have been plagiarized from Brooks' Profile on Raiders.com [1]. Until the article is rewritten, I'm placing a Copy Vio Tag. --ShadowJester07 04:55, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion vs. Facts[edit]

8/06: I recently noticed that a lot of opinion was injected on this page, about Brooks' smiles and sunflower seed chewing and allusions to Brooks not caring; some casual sarcastic remarks were included, and some poor grammar as well. All of this was either unsubstantiated speculation, irrelevant to this person's career and performance, or both. I removed some of these statements, but left all the clinical and factual information intact. I was also responsible for the recent re-order of some of the paragraphs, which were presented somewhat by chronological order, but not consistently so. Brooks' accomplishments from the 2000 season were completely missing, and I added that content. This is a living person. I hope we can keep things about him neutral. [[MattBattison 18:31, 27 August 2006 (UTC)]][reply]

YouTube links[edit]

This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally. Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 07:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot (talk) 17:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whew!!![edit]

That was THE MOST BIAS article I've ever had to work on!!!! Man, who ever wrote that should be slapped. That was just rid-damn-diculous!! --Crash Underride 01:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]