Talk:Abbasid invasion of Asia Minor (806)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk · contribs) 19:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status and should have my full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 19:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Background, "Nikephoros assembled his army and marched out himself to meet a second, larger invasion under the Caliph himself." Is there any way to avoid the repetition of "himself"?
- The campaign, "(gazi, hajj)" What is this supposed to mean?
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Sources all look good, no indication of OR or copyvio.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Other than a couple of minor prose issues (detailed above), I can find nothing of issue in this article. Because of that, I am passed it to GA as is; I hope that the issues I list above will be rectified, but in my opinion they do not reflect on the article's readability to the point of preventing it from being listed as a GA. Please let me know if you have any questions, Dana boomer (talk) 20:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)