Talk:Absenteeism
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Still waiting for an answer......... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wonder51 (talk • contribs) 20:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
This is not relevant to the article as a whole and so isn't appropriate as an External link link. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 16:40, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Again stop adding a random external link to this article. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 11:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
The page is relevant to the discussion of Absenteeism. In fact the entire wiki page needs an upgrade to reflect different aspects of this problem. I did notice you seem fine with a commercial link which should be removed as it adds nothing except a service to buy if you have the problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wonder51 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- If you want the Australian link gone I would be inclined to agree. The reason I have removed your link because it was new and so flashed up on my watchlist. The reason I left it previously, and the reason I presume it was added in the first place, is because the URL looks official and it contains a calculator tool that would be useful to article readers. The fact is that even if your blog is about absenteeism it doesn't mean it should be listed as an external link on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a directory. The External Links section should contain sites that are most relevant, most definitive authorities on the subject at hand. As I said previously if you think the Australian site should go I would agree. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 09:04, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- Please be cautious adding external links. Wikipedia is not a collection of links and should not be used for advertising. Excessive or inappropriate links will be removed.
- If you want the Australian link gone I would be inclined to agree. The reason I have removed your link because it was new and so flashed up on my watchlist. The reason I left it previously, and the reason I presume it was added in the first place, is because the URL looks official and it contains a calculator tool that would be useful to article readers. The fact is that even if your blog is about absenteeism it doesn't mean it should be listed as an external link on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a directory. The External Links section should contain sites that are most relevant, most definitive authorities on the subject at hand. As I said previously if you think the Australian site should go I would agree. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 09:04, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:External links and Wikipedia:Spam for details.
- If there are already suitable links, propose additions or replacements on the article's talk page, or submit your link to the relevant category at the Open Directory Project (dmoz.org) and link there using {{Dmoz}}. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 08:41, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Dr. Pfeifer's comment on this article
[edit]Dr. Pfeifer has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
This short article excludes the (labor) economic perspective on absenteeism.
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Pfeifer has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
- Reference : Christian Pfeifer, 2009. "Effective Working Hours and Wages: The Case of Downward Adjustment via Paid Absenteeism," Working Paper Series in Economics 152, University of Luneburg, Institute of Economics.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 18:58, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Peterson.stavros, Polster.takala, Kylepopo, Robbins.Ryan.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:16, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Potential Changes Needed
[edit]The last paragraph of the article says the evidence finds but there is not source listed. If the source is added and the source draws those conclusions, it should be kept. Otherwise, it is drawing your own conclusions and should not be included in the article. Polster.takala (talk) 22:29, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Some References that could help
[edit]Lam, C., Huang, X., & Chiu, W. (2010). Mind over Body? The Combined Effect of Objective Body Weight, Perceived Body Weight, and Gender on Illness-Related Absenteeism. Sex Roles, 63(3-4), 277-289. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9779-1
[2]3. THE AUSTRALASIAN FACULTY OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE (1999). 145 Macquarie Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia. https://www.racp.edu.au/docs/default-source/faculties-library/workplace-attendance-and-absenteeism.pdf?sfvrsn=4
4. Blandul, Valentin. (April 2013). Scholar Absenteeism – A Continues Challenge of Contemporary Education". Social and Behavioral Sciences. Volume 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.231
5. Dube, Shanta R. and Pamela Orpinas. "Understanding Excessive School Absenteeism as School Refusal Behavior." Children & Schools, vol. 31, no. 2, Apr. 2009, pp. 87-95. EBSCOhost
Jump up ^ Myers, Karen (Fall, 2017). "Millennials in the Workplace: A Communication Perspective on Millennials' Organizational Relationships and Performance". Journal of Business and Psychology. 25: 225–238. Check date values in: |date= (help) Jump up ^ Boe, T.; Hysing, M.; Petrie, K. J.; Sivertsen, B. (2017). "Parental work absenteeism is associated with increased symptom complaints and school absence in adolescent children". BMC Public Health. 17 (439): 1–7. doi:doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4368-7 Check |doi= value (help).
"Sickies" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect Sickies has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 23 § Sickies until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA24 - Sect 200 - Thu
[edit]This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2024 and 13 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): DOSTPIDE (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by DOSTPIDE (talk) 21:03, 27 October 2024 (UTC)