Talk:Abutilon theophrasti
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I've deleted "Velvetleaf Abutilon" as a common name as I cannot find any actual usage of this name; all references I can find refer to this species simply as "Velvetleaf" (or "velvet leaf" or "velvet-leaf"). Not even the New Royal Horticultural Society Dictionary of Gardening or Mabberley's The Plant Book (which cannot by any stretch of the imagination be called USA-centric) list "Velvetleaf Abutilon" among the several common names they give for this species. MrDarwin 16:00, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Abutilon theophrasti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060616045241/http://www.nwcb.wa.gov/weed_info/Written_findings/Abutilon_theophrasti.html to http://www.nwcb.wa.gov/weed_info/Written_findings/Abutilon_theophrasti.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100628165531/http://www.css.cornell.edu/weedeco/Published%20Seed%20Sci%20Res.%2011%20335-343.pdf to http://www.css.cornell.edu/WeedEco/Published%20Seed%20Sci%20Res.%2011%20335-343.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:59, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
November 2021[edit]
Regarding the tone template, note that the article is structured as a textbook, or some other biology material should be, and not in an encyclopaedic manner. It describes the subject in a generally non-cohesive manner, and uses broken/crude English. Language and style improvements needed here. MxWondrous (talk) 13:43, 3 November 2021 (UTC)