Talk:Academic specialization

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

This Article is poorly written

This article is very poorly written, and it could and should be greatly expanded. This topic is so important within the world of academia, and it deserves more attention. It is a stub that is at start quality.

==Wiki Education assignment: Foundations of Education== This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2022 and 17 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Keithrlee13 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Kara0719.

Requesting an edit[edit]

Scholars have found significant scientific rewards to specialization in academic research in the biomedical context, with papers of more specialized scientists being cited more than those of less specialized scientists.[1] [2] AM13prime (talk) 10:06, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done What is your rationale for these changes? Additionally, these appear to be primary sources. Please review WP:SECONDARY and specifically for biomedical sciences, Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine)#Respect_secondary_sources. SpencerT•C 22:07, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ de Rassenfosse, Gaétan; Higham, Kyle; Penner, Orion (2022). "Scientific rewards for biomedical specialization are large and persistent". BMC Biology.
  2. ^ Abramo, Giovanni; D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea; Di Costa, Flavia (2019). "Diversification versus specialization in scientific research: Which strategy pays off?".