Talk:Acceleware

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Facts[edit]

This web page is all facts. There is nothing stating that "acceleware is a superior product". Facts like "Acceleware launched into the Imaging market in 2008" is only fact. There was also a note saying that I had no sources or references - if you look I have 4 that quite clearly take into account the technology and the markets that Acceleware is in. I don't understand how this is being written like an advertisement. Please let me know how I can make this an acceptable entry.Kwohlgemut (talk) 17:51, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the first two links don't mention Acceleware, and the last two seem to be copies of press releases. Other than that, there doesn't seem to be any indication of why this company is notable (see Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)). Hope that helps. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Avoid language like "launching" or anything else that smacks of the press release, trade journal puff piece or corporate advertisement. Don't use trademark, copyright or servicemark symbols. Don't provide "references" to company pages and press releases; instead, provide properly-formatted references to reliable, impartial third-party sources which discuss the company at length to show some evidence that this firm is of note. Don't put in "partner lists" or product catalogs. Don't put in a lot of fluff about executives. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have made some changes to this page - including new references etc. Can we please take off the "speedy deletion" and other notices off of this page?

Thanks so much72.29.234.161 (talk) 22:24, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1. This material is not about a notable organization. 2. No reliable sources can be found mentioning this company as well. So, no reason to be placed in encyclopedia. Ververe (talk) 19:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edit[edit]

I attempted to improve some of the wording, grammar, and manual of style issues as well as fixing punctuation. Please let me know if anything further needs to be done, or if I made any glaring mistakes. This effort is part of The Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Wperdue (talk)wperdue

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Acceleware. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Acceleware&oldid=1197903407"