Talk:Acoelomorpha

Animals Low‑importance

Acoelomorpha is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Marine life (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

What distinguishes Acoelomorpha from Placozoa ? The description of the former sounds allot like the latter.

This page should say the approximate number of known species in the phylum. --Savant13 13:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Someone needs to find a reliable source for that. -- Donald Albury 12:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Validity disputed

See

Wallberg, A., Curini-Galletti, M., Ahmadzadeh, A. & Jondelius, U. (2007). Dismissal of Acoelomorpha: Acoela and Nemertodermatida are separate early bilaterian clades. — Zoologica Scripta, 36, 509–523.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Acoelomorpha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phylum?

According to the Xenacoelomorpha article, it is a clade, not a phylum. Which is correct?160.111.254.17 (talk) 15:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Phylum" is for people who care about such things. Phyla, for those who accept their existence, are clades, as are all biological divisions. Hard core cladists don't care about stamp-collecting labels, as long as the ordering is correct. Put species at one end, animalia at the other, and every step between is just a clade. Simple and done. Anyway, someone seems to have nailed the label Phylum onto Xenacoelomorpha in its article now. (talk) 18:43, 7 December 2019 (UTC)just a wiki reader[reply]