Talk:Action of 7 May 1794/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:44, 4 April 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
    References need place of publication
    Done
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    How many guns did the frigate have? And is there anything on how it wasn't able to outrun the 74? Ordinarily I'd expect a frigate to have no real problem evading a ship of the line unless there was heavy weather or trapped on a lee shore, or somesuch.
    No. of guns added (although the sources do not give a figure for the corvette). I originally thought that a frigate should be able to always outrun a ship of the line, but in fact it didn't work that way: because they were much bigger, ships of the line were more stable and could carry more sail than a frigate. In strong winds this made them the fastest things at sea, and there were dozens of additional factors that could contribute to the relative speed of sailing vessels - unfortunately my available sources do not list which ones contributed to the failure of Linois to outrun Boyles on this occassion.
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Thanks for the review, I've addressed or answered all of the points you have raised above.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fix the awkward sentence noted and I'll promote this.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, which awkward sentence?--Jackyd101 (talk) 11:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The one marked as awkward.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:15, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've reworded, but I wasn't really sure what the problem was - can you remove the tag if it is sorted? In future can you flag up exactly what is awkward about the phrasing in the review so I can understand more clearly what needs to be changed? Thanks--Jackyd101 (talk) 01:36, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I had a hard time articulating what I felt was wrong so I left the tag in the hopes that you'd be able to pick up on it. Anyway, I tweaked it a little, see if it works for you. But I'm promoting it in the meantime.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:54, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Action_of_7_May_1794/GA1&oldid=354239229"