Talk:Action of 9 July 1806/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

This is a very nice article

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

What photograph?--Jackyd101 (talk) 10:23, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Not as smoothly written as some of your other articles, but still nicely done, and interesting.

Thanks for the review and copyedit, much appreciated. If you have any further comments please let me know.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:50, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]