Talk:Ad Neeleman
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This page was proposed for deletion by L.tak (talk · contribs) on 21 February 2011 with the comment: Could not find enough establishing notability for wikipedia under WP:notability (academics). Scopus.com gives 11 papers; of which the most cited one has been cited 11 times. That would not be sufficient for inclusion on wikipedia I guess. I have left a note on generative grammar (in which tradition he falls according to this article, but where he is not mentioned) regarding his notability in December, but have received no response; so therefore I am Prod'ing it. It was contested by Phil Bridger (talk · contribs) on 2011-02-22 with the comment: Google Scholar finds papers and books with citation counts of 179, 136, 119, 101, 83 etc. |
Start a discussion about improving the Ad Neeleman page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Ad Neeleman" page.
