Jump to content

Talk:Adaptations of The Lord of the Rings

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Games

[edit]

The games section misses out board games. There are several board games based on LotR, including a quiz one, a strategy one, and a Monopoly one. Also, the wording "real-world games" needs changing. They are all real-world games, even the video games. Golfimbul would be a Middle-earth game that is not real-world, though I have heard of Tolkien fans playing it, though not with heads! Carcharoth 12:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Found the articles on the games (forgot the Risk one): Risk: Lord of the Rings Trilogy Edition and Lord of the Rings (board game). See also Category:Middle-earth games. There are also LotR chess sets around. Does that count as an "adaptation"? See also Works_inspired_by_J._R._R._Tolkien, which in some areas is overlapping with this article. Not sure where to draw the line, but a clear distinction does need to be made. Carcharoth 13:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Middle-earth in popular culture is also overlapping quite a bit. Carcharoth 13:18, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Let's see... "adaptations" would probably encompass all the films, stage productions and radio plays. Art, games and music would go under "works inspired" (did that). "Pop culture references" could include some music, games (but where to draw the line?) and more importantly, random references meant to be humorous, a la Family Guy (I don't watch the show). Uthanc 04:20, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For now, I've created a navbox to more tightly associate these three articles, and hopefully at some point the distinctions will become clearer. There might also be a case for classifying some of the instances under "merchandising". The chess sets based on LotR are a clear example of minimal inspiration being used to sell a product, though a chess set collector or Tolkien collector will see them as a work of art, rather than a merchandising thing. Difficult to draw a line here as well. Carcharoth 09:21, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


1981 Radio Play

[edit]

I know there is a fairly detailed description of this elsewhere, but it seems to me that this adapatation was a very important piece of work, and laid much of the groundwork for Peter Jackson's script. Modifications to characters and timelines etc. carry over form the Radio adaptation to the film, and the fact that Ian Holm occured in both was no coincidence.

Before I invest some time and add to this section, does anyone know whether or not there is a similar section elsewhere in the LOR material that documents these similarities?

--CatWatcher 10:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's The Lord of the Rings (1981 radio series). Uthanc 11:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Split Stage material

[edit]

As requested, I split the stage material from the main article and made the separate article "Lord of the Rings (musical)". No substantive changes made, just updated the London production information JeanColumbia 21:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second wave LOTR films

[edit]

I've removed the paragraph discussing a second wave of LOTR films. It's highly suspicious considering a few things:

1) There is no source or citation (it only passingly mentions Entertainment Weekly) regarding what would seem to be huge film industry news. 2) To remake a set of films that originally took 10 years of Jackson's life seems to be overkill, especially considering... 3) ...Jackson's relationship (centering around a court case) with New Line and their executives.

If somebody adds a proper citation I think it would be welcome, but incredibly surprising, news. Ignitus 10:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:LOTRROTKmovie.jpg

[edit]

Image:LOTRROTKmovie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image Image:LOTRTTTmovie.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious

[edit]

Did the Disney Company ever get the rights, or is this something that started here and spread? Tolkien is on record as a Disney hater. Also, I've added stuff about the Ackerman/Zimmerman proposal and (re-added) info on John Boorman's proposal. Uthanc (talk) 17:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comic books

[edit]

There was a 1980 comic book by a Spanish artist named Luis Bermejo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.72.149.254 (talk) 16:21, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adaptations of The Lord of the Rings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Adaptations of The Lord of the Rings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TV series

[edit]

Is the upcoming TV series really an adaptation of LOTR given that it is set before LOTR? It may be an adaptation of the Silmarillion, but that's not clear.--Jack Upland (talk) 16:46, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Readings

[edit]

Is a reading an adaptation?--Jack Upland (talk) 21:52, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. GimliDotNet (talk) 20:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Adaptations_of_The_Lord_of_the_Rings&oldid=1197991934"