Talk:Adarsh Alphons
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Notability
[edit]I have removed unsourced puffery and tagged 6 sentences for failing verification, how does he pass WP:GNG I wonder? Theroadislong (talk) 18:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Substantial indepth media coverage. CNN hero, created a large organization. How can he not pass GNG? May also pass WP:ARTIST Legacypac (talk) 18:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
[edit]User:Shaheba Sultana says on their talk page that “Adarsh himself gave me his all information to make this page” that looks like a conflict of interest to me? Theroadislong (talk) 19:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- It looks more that you are unreasonably harsh for a new user and try to tarnish the author. The Banner talk 19:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Agree with above. From the looks of it there isn't really conflict of interest, they just care about the topic. – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 16:17, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
- I'll remove Shaheba Sultana from the notice as they seem fine. – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 23:19, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
- Agree with above. From the looks of it there isn't really conflict of interest, they just care about the topic. – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 16:17, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
@Theroadislong: I said it because some said me these citations are not worthy for verification! I said it based on your question that how can it be? Shaheba Sultana (talk) 07:26, 26 October 2018 (UTC)