Talk:Aditi Technologies
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 May 2013. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aditi Technologies article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
company history, more information about company needed 24.16.154.29 07:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Aditilogo.gif[edit]
Image:Aditilogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Request for Review[edit]
Hello there
I am the contributor for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aditi_Technologies page.
I have cleaned up all the issues and have aligned the content to wikipedia guidelines. Can you please review the page and help me to get away from the issues status message.
I am open for feedback.
Many Thanks Ashwin
Ashwinckm1983 (talk) 10:51, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- I have quickly reviewed the page, and it seems to be well developed. MrScorch6200 (talk) 04:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)