Talk:Aerolite (adhesive)

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Science

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Transport

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Strength of adhesive bonded joints in wood[edit]

The introduction to this article says: "a properly made Aerolite joint is said to be three times stronger than spruce wood." Who says this? i.e. it is not supported by a citation. Furthermore it is not true, and is a common myth. A good type of structural finger joint using an adhesive such as Aerolite will have an efficiency of around 85% at best. See for example BS 5268 Part 2.

I shall alter the article in a few weeks time if there is not response to this "Talk."

Dendrotek 11:14, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

There's a difference though between "bond" and "joint". Simple long-grain butts with modern adhesives should exceed the strength of typical softwoods (i.e. the timber breaks first). However these are not a useful example of an overall joint. There's also the issue that "efficiency" is based on a usable strength for the purposes of design, with the usual assumptions made about "safety factors" _(sic). That's also a different thing to the actual strength of the joint when tested. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:12, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]