Jump to content

Talk:Aeroplane Jelly/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    It doesn't really go into anything between 1966 and 1995. Not a showstopper, but a good place for expansion.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    A picture of the product itself, in some form, would be a welcome addition, but the absence of such a picture is not a reason to hold this article back.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    One of the best-prepared GA articles I've had the pleasure to review. Jclemens (talk) 02:53, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]