Talk:African Auxiliary Pioneer Corps

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CE[edit]

Cheeky little ce, blammed a few typos, tidied prose, added oclc or issn to references, auto ed etc. Nice piece of work.Keith-264 (talk) 11:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:African Auxiliary Pioneer Corps/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 18:36, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria[edit]

1. Prose  Pass

2. Verifiability  Pass

3. Depth of Coverage  Pass

4. Neutral  Pass

5. Stable  Pass

6. Illustrations  Pass

7. Miscellaneous  Pass

Comments[edit]

1.

  • "was a unit of the British army" - Should British Army be capitalized?

checkY

checkY

  • You link shillings, but not pence. Is there a specific reason for this?

checkY

  • "Building railroads from Beirut to Haifa, tunneling, loading ammunition onto trains, guarding supplies and working as cooks." - Sentence fragment

checkY

checkY

  • "2 MBEs, 7 Military Medals, 8 British Empire Medals" - MOS:NUMERALS

checkY

  • Lead could use a little expansion.
Lede expanded.--Catlemur (talk) 22:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

  • Is photography really the best way to describe the paintings of the AAPC activities? Looks like they'd be licensed public domain as a painting, too, but it seems like a description of a painting would be better than a description of a photograph.
Added "A painting of" to the description of paintings within the article. Would that suffice?--Catlemur (talk) 21:54, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Catlemur: - Sorry, I wasn't very clear. I was referring to the licensing information on Commons. Hog Farm (talk) 02:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Hog Farm: I removed all the paintings, perhaps I will sort the licensing some other day.--Catlemur (talk) 07:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

7.

Good work. Placing on hold. Hog Farm (talk) 21:28, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]