Talk:African Queens and Women Cultural Leaders Network

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Africa Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

According to Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability." (Emphasis added). Currently, there are zero such sources in this article. JJCaesar (talk) 00:09, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? This feels a little like an editor who has disagreed with my editing elsewhere trying to make some kind of point. The coverage in the UNESCO published book "Agree to Differ" (currently footnote one), while not devoting huge amounts of space to the topic, is certainly not "trivial or incidental". Nor are the UN Statement from Uganda (currently footnote number two) or the Daily Monitor article (currently footnote three) which are solely about the network. The Saturday Vision and Uganda State House (currently footnotes four and five) sources both include explanations of what the network is and does, unlike a trivial or incidental mention which would be one that 'namechecks' it in the context of some other discussion or merely mentions it in a list (see the examples of "trivial coverage" on WP:NORG). I haven't bothered to go further into the rest of the current sources right now as there are clearly more than 'zero' that provide more than trivial or incidental coverage. Melcous (talk) 12:43, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]