Talk:African river martin

I guess the main question that is not answered on this page is: Can an african swallow carry a coconut? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.246.151.62 (talk) 05:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Taxobox image

Hmm...doesn't much look like a martin...more like a Blackbird (????????????) Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:41, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

TFAR

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/African river martin --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Description

Cas Liber I'd like to ask about this sentence, which appears in the second paragraph in African river martin#Description:

• There are many bird species in which there is sexual dichromatism which is not apparent to the human eye, but spectroscopic analysis of this martin's head feathers suggests that the colour differences between the sexes are small even to the birds' perception.

The way this is worded, particularly the phrase at the end, "even to the birds' perception", sounds as if the spectroscopic analysis discovered that the differences "are small even to the birds' perception". I'm wondering if that is even possible. I can understand a spectroscopic analysis discovering that the colour differences between the sexes are small, but not that the birds perceive the differences as small. Perhaps a few words could be added to indicate that the differences are small even to the birds' perception, but not as something discovered through spectroscopic analysis, perhaps:

• There are many bird species in which there is sexual dichromatism which is not apparent to the human eye, but spectroscopic analysis of this martin's head feathers suggests that the colour differences between the sexes are small, probably also even to the birds' perception.

Also, even though "which" is often used to introduce a restrictive adjective clause (more on WP than elsewhere), it would be good to avoid the use of "which" twice in close proximity. I suggest using "that" for the second one:

• There are many bird species in which there is sexual dichromatism that is not apparent to the human eye, but spectroscopic analysis of this martin's head feathers suggests that the colour differences between the sexes are small, probably also even to the birds' perception.

– Corinne (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

P.S. - It would read just a bit better if it said "the differences in colour between the sexes" instead of "the colour differences between the sexes":

• There are many bird species in which there is sexual dichromatism that is not apparent to the human eye, but spectroscopic analysis of this martin's head feathers suggests that the differences in colour between the sexes are small, probably also even to the birds' perception.

I might even suggest using the singular: "...the difference in colour between the sexes is small". Using the singular "the difference" does not necessarily mean that the feathers contain only one color:

• There are many bird species in which there is sexual dichromatism that is not apparent to the human eye, but spectroscopic analysis of this martin's head feathers suggests that the difference in colour between the sexes is small, probably also even to the birds' perception. – Corinne (talk) 23:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

The Indians article

The Indians were slaves for the other Indians and this is what's on my mind? Jaiden francis (talk) 14:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on African river martin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121017232455/http://www.eoearth.org/article/Eastern_Congolian_swamp_forests to http://www.eoearth.org/article/Eastern_Congolian_swamp_forests
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.africanbirdclub.org/countries/Gabon/news.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:57, 19 May 2017 (UTC)