Talk:Agardanda

India: Maharashtra / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

The Name[edit]

The article is written about the village, but the name says Agardanda "Beach" that make confusion whether the article is about a village or Beach. Can someone please put spotlight on this. I think the name should be Agardanda that I don't want to change without discussion. Cheers GSS (talk) 15:05, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 7 January 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure). sst ✈ 15:37, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agardanda Beach → Agardanda – article is about a village Vin09 (talk) 16:54, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about a village in Raigad district, Maharashtra but the name and the coordinates (18.165288°N 72.594023°E) pointing to the beach which creating confusion. So I think the name should be Agardanda and then we can change the coordinates to 18.2793111°N 72.9898068°E which pointing to the village situated on the beach. Agardanda Beach can be redirect to Agardanda later if needed. GSS (talk) 18:05, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support In ictu oculi (talk) 18:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.