Talk:Agharta (manga)

This page was proposed for deletion by AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) on 5 September 2009 with the comment:
Unnotable manga series that fails WP:BK and WP:N
It was contested by Quasirandom (talk · contribs) on 2009-09-06 with the comment:
Reviews in French need to be evaluated, but there appears to be enough of those (as well as an English review of the French edition) to pass WP:BK

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

reviews?[edit]

Ok,

Near Zero review from French RS. Vol. 7 review Vol. 8 very short take Vol. 9 short review. I guess that enough to give it a narrow pass at WP:N.

That series suffers from its very slow release rate one volume per year + all reviewers pointed out that how complex & confusing is plot. A re-read of the whole series is near mandatory to understand each new volume release. --KrebMarkt 17:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Add to those also an English review (from Canada) of the French edition. Notability is thinly demonstrated by Western sources, but enough so I'm convinced it's notable. (Besides, nothing survives in Ultra Jump for 12 years without have some sort of popularity and notice.) —Quasirandom (talk) 17:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beside that just coverage for the French edition where people were dragging their to review it because of the time needed for a complete reread of the series before to assess the latest volume properly. There should be coverage in the others translated languages. --KrebMarkt 21:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]