Jump to content

Talk:Agro-terrorism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

Don't you think we should refrain from giving these people ideas?--Dudeman5685 07:22, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. As I see it, it's no different from describing the workings of an atomic bomb or giving a movie spoiler. This article is no more "giving people ideas" than the description of the hypothetical video game Body Harvest Moon. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 11:33, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is very poor logic to make the comparison between a real-world criminal act and the making of an atomic bomb, which, cannot be done by anyone except maybe a government or very well funded institution that would not get it "how to" from Wikipedia. In addition, it is also poor logic to compare real-world events with hypotheticals such as movies and video games. (Thinkforonce (talk) 16:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]
Wikipedia does not publish original research aka creates ideas, it republishes already existing terrorism ideas. It helps ordinary people to understand and accept governmental contra-measures better. It also reduces the psychological effect of terrorist acts, when people already know about the potential threats. In summary, republishing terrorism ideas on Wikipedia makes terrorism less effective.--Geysirhead (talk) 20:47, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fruitflies - dubious?

[edit]

The release of fruitflies is marked "dubious - discuss", but there is no discussion. I'm removing the "dubious" tag and adding a cite needed in its place. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Agro-terrorism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]