Talk:Ahmadzai (Ghilji clan)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Afghanistan

	Afghanistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Pashtun

	Ahmadzai (Ghilji clan) is part of WikiProject Pashtun, a project to maintain and expand Pashtun-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.PashtunWikipedia:WikiProject PashtunTemplate:WikiProject PashtunPashtun articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article is a total mess

Either fix it or delete it. 2601:642:4102:BC60:65ED:2373:BDFA:555C (talk) 09:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but Wikipedia is a self-serve place. I have added a good source, feel free to change the article into a better one. Викидим (talk) 17:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmadzai trib

Ahmadzai was nine 9 son's who names are 1)yahiya.yahiyakhil (2)mussa.mussakhil (3) essa.essakhil (4)maruf.marupkhil (5)jabar.jabarkhil(6) Aladen.aladenkhil (7) brim.brimkhil (8) zandde.zanddekhil (9) babukar.babukarkhil . Ahmadzai divided by 9 trib .remember Afghanistan ex president ashraf ghani ahmadzai belong to mussakhil trib. and Afghanistan ex president najeeb ullah and alhaj tako khan taghar ahmadzai belong to yahiyakhil trib . And ex parliamentarian zahir qadeer family belong to jabarkhil trib . 103.255.6.70 (talk) 22:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of cn tags

@Noorullah21:: WP:TAGBOMB is an essay and certainly cannot override the WP:V. So I am going with the recommendations of the essay "Improve it yourself" and removing all very strange an un-encyclopedic claims that used to be marked with {{cn}}: for many months, no source was provided. Please note that your reversal of my revert goes against the basics of WP:CONS, it would have made sense after my reversal to start a discussion here. In any case, the {{cn}} were placed due to some claims being WP:EXCEPTIONAL (like "There are some rules which no one can break and if they took responsibility they mean it"). Викидим (talk) 02:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't understand. @Викидим

You don't mass tag bomb an entire wikipedia page in every line with "citation needed", you simply add a template [at the top], or break it down. What you're doing is considered TAGBOMBING, which can result in a block after being asked to stop; "...Editors who engage in tag bombing after being asked to stop may be blocked from editing Wikipedia." -- See WP:OVERTAG. Noorullah (talk) 04:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The tags were not "vague", they indicated the particular issues with the text. The problems were very obvious (unusual and strange claims with no sources whatsoever, see an exaple above), so IMHO OVERTAG did not apply. In any case, there is hopefully no issue now, so we can continue discussing the text of the article. Викидим (talk) 05:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]