Jump to content

Talk:Ahmed Akkari

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Death threats made by Akkari

[edit]

It seems that Ahmed Akkari made a death threat against a prominent danish politican (Naser Khader), currently I've only been able to find danish sources on this though. The threats were made in front of a camera (which he apparently didn't know was recording), Akkari claims there isn't any intent behind the "joke". The folks behind the camera is a french documentary team, so there could be something about this on french news sites. northyen.dk 17:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added an English source from Reuters. Azate 21:02, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Can anyone find the Arabic sentence and put it on the article, since the translation is disputed? In any case both Arabic -> Danish -> English and Arabic -> French -> Danish -> English translation routes are suspect.--Per Abrahamsen 15:00, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not just any Imam

[edit]

This source, from National Danish Radio, http://www.dr.dk/Nyheder/Indland/2006/03/23/014126.htm c already in the article, claims that he is an imam. I found hundreds of others, but most were blogs.

This source, from National Danish TV http://politik.tv2.dk/article.php/3617652.html among other sources claims he is not just any imam, but "talsmand for Islamisk Trossamfund" approximately, "spokesman of the islamic faith congregation in denmark."

Some of this should be mentioned.DanielDemaret 21:37, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's tricky. Lots of sources (including the Reuters one I included myself) call him "Imam". Others I've come across specifically deny that. He himself denied it only a fortnight ago. (Don't know what he claims now). "Imam" has, not in strict sense of the word - but in common use certainly, always a religious undercurrent. For the leader of an organization "rais" would more likely be used. I personally feel that the use of the title "Imam" for anybody with less credentials than as at least regular and (by his flock) commonly accepted prayer leader or religious guide is unwarranted. Akkari doesn't have a parish or community or whatever you'd prefer top call it. Others may think that his involvement in the cartoon affair has given him enough clout to be called one. I'm willing to try to dig up the reference of Akkari himself saying he isn't an Imam, if we can't find a wording that caters to the uncertainty. Azate 22:07, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


If you could find a reference where he himself denies being an Imam, that would certainly seem conclusive, so please do.

Am I correct in assuming in assuming that the term is considered honorable? In which case, if he says he is not, there would be absolutely no reason to doubt him?

However, it is a bit strange. Can you think of any reason for DR to call him an Imam? DR is usually quite careful with facts. DanielDemaret 22:17, 23 March 2006 (UTC) Perhaps he just lead prayer once, and the title stuck?DanielDemaret 22:25, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here it goes: "Q: I have read you are an imam? Akkari: No, I am a spokesman for 27 organisations. I am a Danish citizen, I have some theological background, but I am educated in sociology and pedagogy." Source: [1] Telegraph.co.uk interview.Azate 22:55, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry wrong link. This one is correct: [2] Azate 23:05, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Akkari-jeg er dansker.jpg

[edit]

Image:Akkari-jeg er dansker.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Past tense

[edit]

"He is the spokesman of the Danish-based European Committee for Prophet Honouring[4] and (former) spokesman of the Islamisk Trossamfund (Islamic Society in Denmark).[5]"

Although I haven't seen any source saying that he is no longer spokesman for that committee, I think that, given his latest statements, we can safely assume that the entire paragraph can be changed to the past tense and even moved away from the introduction and further down. There is also no reason for the parenteses around "former". Does anyone disagree? --Thathánka Íyotake (talk) 00:58, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Since he appears to no-longer identitify as Muslim and given that the Trossamfund have spoken out against him that seems to be a logical course of action.
I think he still regards himself as a Muslim but he distanced himself from the islamist position.
Anyway, I tried to rewrite the relevant paragraphs.
The article could still be improved - I get a sense that it has a tendency which is not entirely neutral. But my knowledge about the matter is too little to alter this. --Thathánka Íyotake (talk) 00:31, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ahmed Akkari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:31, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]