Talk:Air Force Specialty Code

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vandalism in short description[edit]

Short description contains vandalism. 85.221.158.102 (talk) 15:18, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to About.com[edit]

I added links to about.com because it's already the most comprehensive source of information on the subject. There is no way to make Wikipedia articles about every AFSC without incorporating text from about.com. It may be possible to have a layman's description of each job, as the descriptions in about.com can be somewhat cryptic. However, this would most likely take firsthand knowledge of the job and would not conform to Wikipedia policies of No Original Research. Kajmal 18:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NEEDS RE-WRITE[edit]

This article needs a substantial re-write to conform to the new AFECD published 1 Aug 2010. Most sections need to conform to the Quick Reference here. Deaddebate (talk) 00:32, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article re-written to new 31 Jan 2011 AFECD/AFOCD. Deaddebate (talk) 08:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Officer AFSCs added/revised to reflect current AFOCD[edit]

John E. Hein (talk) 02:37, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Air Force Specialty Code. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Historical List of AFSCs[edit]

Would it improve the article’s history section to either include a matrix, or a link to a separate matrix, that shows which AFSCs before McPeak converted to which after McPeak? TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 18:41, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would definitely improve the article's history. I am an Air Force Veteran from before the change. I would definitely be interested in the various pre-change AFSC codes and what they were converted to. For instance, my AFSC was 426x4 (Jet Powerplant Technician). User:DraakUSA (DraakUSATalk) 20:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]