Jump to content

Talk:Air Safaris

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move?

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: bold move reverted. Opinions here are 2-2, no consensus for CHCBOY's bold move to accommodate their new article on the NZ airline, and the new qualifier (Defunct) is incorrect in any event. Hatnotes are the usual way to handle navigation to new articles unless/until they're determined to be the new primary topic (or to have ushered in no primary topic). If new consensus is formed that there is no longer a primary topic, the disambiguation page can be moved here once this is moved to Air Safaris (UK airline). -- JHunterJ (talk) 17:48, 4 July 2012 (UTC) JHunterJ (talk) 17:48, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Air Safaris (Defunct)Air Safaris

  • Completely agree! And a disambiguation page is completely unneccessary for only two articles. A hatnote is appropriate in this case (I've already added one). Disambiguation pages are not list articles. Sionk (talk) 14:42, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
When I see an exclamation mark in a debate I think overstatement. But whatever, Sionk, you have deleted the other No.3 No.4 less notable Air Safaris. I'd still oppose the return as the name is somewhat generic, plus Vegaswikian's oppose, but not really bothered. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:04, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Articles were deleted? I did not see any. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:25, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how In ictu oculi can second-guess how much (or how little) I agree with someone either ;) Sionk (talk) 11:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I clearly support the original name, and as it is normal practice to revert undiscussed page moves but for some reason this was also reverted so I propose that this discussion is closed the article moved back to its original name (per normal practice) and any move request from Air Safaris made after the move back. MilborneOne (talk) 16:21, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
We are but my point is it should be just moved back without discussion, which is what I did before being reverted. The discussion was not needed as the original move had no consensus. So I dont oppose it being at Air Safaris what I object to is the travesty of a move request that is not really needed. So we have got into a backwater of an out of process request. I was reluctant to revert the revert as that could be seen as a WP:WHEEL so to break the impass if nobody else comments I will put it back to Air Safaris after twenty-four hours and anybody wanting to rename it can start a new move request. MilborneOne (talk) 18:16, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I assumed the request would be non-controversial. I'm not an admin so couldn't move it back myself. I'm not sure Vegaswikian realised the series of events when they opposed the move back to its original name. Sionk (talk) 19:34, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Understood Sionk you raised it in good faith, I reverted it as an Admin but even I got reverted! MilborneOne (talk) 20:38, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.