Talk:Albania in the Eurovision Song Contest 2008/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 15:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
I will review this later today; hopefully it can mark a nomination of yours becoming a GA the same day as my review! --K. Peake 15:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
[edit]- Infobox looks good!
- Target Radio Televizioni Shqiptar to RTSH
- "to compete in the final." → "to compete in the grand final." with the target
- "In the grand final" → "In the final"
Background
[edit]- Good
Before Eurovision
[edit]Festivali i Këngës
[edit]Competing entries
[edit]- Good
Shows
[edit]Semi-finals
[edit]- "featured guest performance from Albanian Elita 5." → "featured a guest performance from Albanian rock band Elita 5." with the target; looks like you were going to finish the introduction to them but forgot
- Artist → Artist(s)
Final
[edit]- "from Italian Neri per Caso and Swedish Rednex." → "from Italian a cappella group Neri per Caso and Swedish musical group Rednex." since you need to give more introductory info than just their nationalities
At Eurovision
[edit]- Img is a neat addition and it looks good!
- "and the final on" → "and the grand final on" with the target
- "in one of the two semi-finals." → "in one of the two."
- "although Albania was placed" → "with Albania being placed" since this is not in spite of the fact the draw was held for countries
- Target second to Eurovision Song Contest 2008#Semi-final 2
- "it was announced that it" → "it was announced that Albania"
Voting
[edit]- "Albania finished in 17th position," → "Albania finished in 17th place,"
Points awarded to Albania
[edit]- Good
Points awarded by Albania
[edit]- Good
References
[edit]- Copyvio score looks great at 13.0%!
- Ref layout is 100% fine
Final comments and verdict
[edit]- On hold until everything is fixed! --K. Peake 17:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Kyle Peake, I responded to all your comments.--Lorik17 (talk) 17:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Lorik2017 Very quick for you to get to it after my review of this article, plus it's been great to see that you have been baring my previous suggestions in mind while preparing these articles for GA status. ✓ Pass now, awesome that this became a GA on the day of my review! --K. Peake 17:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- I'm also looking forward to work with you Kyle Peake on other related articles. Thanks for your correctness :)--Lorik17 (talk) 20:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Lorik2017 Very quick for you to get to it after my review of this article, plus it's been great to see that you have been baring my previous suggestions in mind while preparing these articles for GA status. ✓ Pass now, awesome that this became a GA on the day of my review! --K. Peake 17:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Kyle Peake, I responded to all your comments.--Lorik17 (talk) 17:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)